Ivona MLADINEO*, DVM, PhD, (Corresponding author, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org), Associate Professor, Scientific Advisor in Tenure, Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries Split, Croatia
Supported by the intensified migration and transport of people and foodstuffs, expansion of culinary trends that rely on raw and lightly thermally processed seafood, more sustainable management of aquatic resources, primarily marine mammals in terms of their conservation, and the development of more sensitive diagnostic tools, the rate of fish-borne parasitosis cases has increased worldwide in recent decades. Judging from a recent ranking, anisakiasis is one of the most important zoonoses in Europe from the public health perspective. The infective third-stage larva of the nematode Anisakis spp. is contracted by consumption of insufficiently thermally processed fish and cephalopods, evoking gastric, intestinal, ectopic or (gastro) allergic clinical type of disease in humans. Moreover, based on the widespread anti-Anisakis seroprevalence in the asymptomatic healthy population, a fifth form of the disease has been proposed. In contrast to the ubiquitous nature of the larvae in paratenic hosts (e.g. fish and cephalopods), the epidemiological status in European countries is very diverse, mostly unknown and strongly underestimated.
Therefore, this article highlights the most important recent assessments of anisakiasis clinical cases at the EU level, with a short overview of the biological characteristics of this nematode.
Ključne riječi: Anisakis spp.; zoonosis; nematode; fish; cephalopods
However, the increasing worldwide perception about benefits of seafood consumption typical to the Mediterranean diet, compared to red meat deemed a risk factor for pathologies such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases (Shamsi, 2019), has consequently increased the need to more closely scrutinise the potential risk of transmitting fish-borne parasites (FBP) from seafood to consumers. The exposure of the human population to such a risk is still vaguely known (Bao et al., 2017), although this is crucial for the implementation of risk management measures, especially in areas where fishing and aquaculture are among the primary activities of the local population.
Although there is an extensive range of helminth parasites in fish, only a moderate number of species is capable of causing food-borne diseases in humans (WHO, 1995). From the public health stance, the number of fish-borne parasitoses (FBP) is still underestimated, although according to palaeoparasitology, this is not an emerging issue (Fornaciari and Gaeta, 2014). It has been speculated that in the Chilean Chinchorro culture, dating back 9,000 years and whose mummification of the dead is considered the oldest example in human history, the fish cestode Diphyllobothrium pacificum (Trematoda, Dyphillobothridae) was related to cases of anaemia, given the Chinchorro’s predominantly seafood diet, according to skull analysis (Arriaza and Standen, 2009). This cestode has been also identified from mummies from the Inca period originating from the Atacama Desert (Santoro et al., 2003). Similarly, eggs of the fish trematode Clonorchis sinensis (Trematoda, Chlonorchidae) have been found in coprolites from corpses of Korean and Chinese Ming, Western Han and Chu dynasties, suggesting its prevalence over the last 2300 years (Fornaciari and Gaeta, 2014).
In contemporary Europe, the EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) published its scientific opinion on the risk assessment of parasites in fishery products, highlighting fishery-bornepar asitic diseases caused by cestodes, trematodes and nematodes that infect humans following ingestion of viable parasites, or as allergic reactions against parasite antigens (EFSA, 2010).
Interestingly, the analysis have mostly focused on the infective third-stage larvae (L3) of the nematode Anisakis simplex, and status and bottlenecks concerning the etiology and pathogenesis of anisakiasis and anisakidosis; i.e. the former entity related to human infection by species of genus Anisakis, and the latter by members of Anisakidae family.
Similarly, anisakids were the main, though not exclusive focus of the EU-driven initiative PARASITE (http://parasite-project.eu/index), developed within the Framework Program 7. The project involved EU and non-EU experts who provided detailed epidemiological studies on zoonotic parasites in European fish stocks, a comprehensive quantitative risk analysis and several innovative technologies to mitigate the impact of zoonotic parasites along the seafood value chain (Levsen et al., 2018).
Another EU network of experts with a broader perspective encompassing the most important EU food-borne parasites (https://www.euro-fbp.org) developed a list prioritising parasite species based on multi-criteria decision analyses (MCDA). This MCDA resulted in a disease risk ranking based on multiple aspects that compose the particular risk, using modified criteria suggested by FAO/ WHO (2014) (Bouwknegt et al., 2018). Anisakis, a single prioritised fish-borne parasite in the study, was scored as seventh at the EU-wide level after Echinococcus multilocularis, Toxoplasma gondii, Trichinella spiralis, E. granulosus, Cryptosporidium spp., and Trichinella spp. other than T. spiralis. Broken down by European regions, it was the fifth most important parasite in Northern, tenth in Western, seventh in Eastern, forth in South-Western and sixth in South-Eastern Europe.
Given that once exotic culinary dishes based on raw or lightly processed seafood, e.g. Japanese sushi and sashimi, Caribbean ceviche, Mediterranean carpaccio, Hollandaise maatjes, Norwegian gravlax, Spanish boquerones en vinagre, Hawaiian lomi lomi, Thai koi pla, pla ra, pla som and som fak, Philippinese kinilaw, sabaw and sukba, have followed the migration of the native population traditionally preparing such meals, and has translocated intercontinental distances, they have since become established within new areas with no or negligible prevalence of the particular FBP. Consequently, this shifted the epidemiological status of these parasites, from endemic areas towards sporadic “allochthonous” outbreaks where the pathogen has not been previously reported. Eiras et al. (2018) reviewed reported cases of fish-borne nematodiases among returned travellers over the past 25 years, retrieving a total of 100 cases of fish-borne nematode infections reported in returned travellers in 22 countries around the world, including seven EU countries (Austria, England, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the Netherlands). The most frequent nematode appeared to be Gnathostoma sp. (Spirurida, Gnathostomatidae) (46 cases), whereas only six reported cases were attributed to Anisakis simplex. The former has the two most important species of public health concern; G. spinigerum endemic to Northeast to Southeast Asia, especially Thailand and Japan (Miyazaki, 1960), and G. binucleatum, endemic to Latin America (Mexico, Ecuador and Peru) (Nawa et al., 2015), both infecting humans through the consumption of live, raw or poorly cooked fish, snakes, frogs and some mammals parasitized by third-stage infective larvae (Akahane et al., 1998).
Given its neglected and emerging character, and the increasing tendency of consumption of lightly processed seafood in the region, the aim of this short overview is to present the recent epidemiological status of Anisakis clinical reports in European countries, excluding allergic hypersensitisation cases, except when relevant for the understanding of the former.
Although both species have a worldwide geographical distribution due to the worldwide migration of their final hosts, marine mammals (Blažeković et al., 2015), at the level of EU waters, the former is more abundant in the North Atlantic, while the latter in the East Mediterranean and adjacent seas. Their sympatric area of admixture is the Alboran Sea (West Mediterranean), although hybrid genotypes can be found as far as in the Adriatic (Mladineo et al., 2017). Such distribution reflects the fact that A. simplex s. s. is mostly contracted in Spain and in Northern EU countries, while A. pegreffii is a more frequent pathogen in Italy and Croatia.Additionally, there are seven other Anisakis species, but to date their involvement in human infection has not been confirmed by molecular tools, as purely morphological identification of L3 is insufficient for taxonomically correct assignment (Mattiucci et al., 2018).
Nonetheless, EFSA (2010) proclaimed that no marine fishing grounds could be considered free of A. simplex larvae in respect to wild-caught fish, while in farmed fish, a rare L3 occurrence has been noted in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) (Levsen and Maage, 2016) and sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) (Cammillieri et al., 2018).
The Anisakis spp. life cycle
Here, the larvae moult into adults of separate sex, which then reproduce and expel eggs that are released by the marine mammals. Within the egg, the first-stage larva (L1) moults into the second-stage larva (L2), or exits the egg and infects the intermediate host, becoming an early L3 larva. A wide range of planktonic euphausiids act as the larval vehicle towards the first paratenic host; fish and cephalopods.
Larvae have shown a preference for a particular organ (Mladineo and Poljak, 2014), while migration into thelater al muscles occurs both intravitam and postmortem in fish (Šimat et al., 2015; Cipriani et al., 2016). When the first paratenic host is ingested by a larger fish or cephalopod, the L3 within its viscera shifts to the second paratenic host. Accidentally, the first paratenic host can be eaten by humans in the form of a thermally lightly or unprocessed dish, setting off anisakiasis or anisakidosis, although L3 can also survive in humans for a limited time. The first or second paratenic host is eventually eaten by the final marine mammalian host, closing this indirect life cycle.
Epidemiology in Europe
The epidemiological situation in respect to clinical cases in Europe is vague, though the global understanding is that the disease is usually misdiagnosed and highly underestimated. EFSA (2010) reported on the incidence of the disease in Spain, the Netherlands and Germany, although such numbers are likely to be underestimated today. For example, two recent and extreme case studies reported that over 200 and 140 larvae were extracted by endoscopy in a Spanish (Jurado-Palomo et al., 2010) and Portuguese patient (Baptista-Fernandes et al., 2017), respectively. Bao et al. (2017) conducted the first quantitative risk analysis of Anisakis infection in Spain, estimating that some 7700-8320 cases are left unreported, in contrast to the actually reported cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year, ranging from 3.87 to 19.2 cases per 100,000 inhabitants per year.
A recent systematic review of epidemiology of food-borne nematodiasis in the EU in the period 2000–2016 reported a total of 236 indigenous clinical cases of anisakiasis, mostly in Spain (158 or 66.9%) and Italy (67 or 28.4%) (Serrano-Moliner et al., 2018). However, these numbers seem to underestimate the real EU status of the disease, as Cavallero et al. (2018) retrieved only from Italian hospital discharge records in total 370 clinical cases obtained from 2005 to 2015. Of these, 40% showed allergic manifestations, of which the half exhibited anaphylactic reactions. Among patients, 80.3% lived near the coast, and 51.1% originated from southern Italy (Apulia). Women prevailed (51.1%), patient mean age was 46.7 years, although the highest frequency occurredbetwee n 40–49 years (21.4%). The mean length of hospital stay was 5.7 days and 62.7% of patients showed a lower educational level. This is in agreement with a previous Italian study of Anisakis sensitisation rates, which showed marked geographic differences (range 0.4-12.7%), indicating that the highest number of cases were reported along the Adriatic and Tyrrhenian coasts. The study suggested that the consumption of homemade marinated anchovies, as an age-old tradition, accounts for such distribution. Moreover, analysing the impact of immigration on the prevalence of Anisakis hypersensitivity showed that immigration from southern Italy or non-EU countries caused sensitisation of approximately 60% subjects in Milan and Turin (AAITO-IFIACI, 2011). Another retrospective epidemiological study in Italy that covered over two decades of literature reports found only 73 cases, the majority of which were detected by endoscopy (51.4%) and laparotomy (48.6%) (Guardone et al., 2018). The site of the parasite was mainly the intestine (42.5%), followed by stomach (43.8%), oesophagus (1.4%) and different ectopic sites (12.3%), whereas the source of infection was raw or undercooked anchovies (65.7%).
In contrast, however, a recent retrospective study spanning the period 2010–2014 estimated that the incidence of anisakids in French hospitals amounted to 37 positively identified clinical cases.
Authors extrapolated this to 0.62 cases/month or 7.4 cases/year, mainly affecting individuals of an average age of 42 years (11-69) and predominantly women (Yera et al., 2018). Interestingly, they indicated that compared to a previous report (e.g. 21 cases in three years; Hubert et al., 1989) this represented a decrease in anisakidosis, most likely related to stricter adherence to EU regulation (2004) and promotional media campaigns.
Clinical cases in Austria and Belgium were reported from travellers returning from the USA and Chile, respectively (Verhamme and Ramboer, 1988; Auer et al., 2007), though there are no recent data.
In Croatia, only two case reports focused on anisakiasis; the first using molecular tools to identify L3 in archival paraffin-embedded sections of the sigmoid colon of a woman deceased from another etiology (Mladineo et al., 2016).
The second reported the pathology in a 14-year boy three days after the consumption of raw fish (sushi), exhibiting oedema and eosinophilic infiltration in the appendix and increased anti-Anisakis IgE titre (Jurić et al., 2013). However, no infective larvae were isolated from the patient, although laparotomy and biopsy were performed early after the onset of symptoms. More importantly, the authors failed to report the specific method of Anisakis serodiagnosis, as it has been acknowledged that most assays tend to overestimate the Ig titre, except for the gold standard, indirect ELISA.
In the healthy asymptomatic Dalmatian population, the seroprevalence of anti-Anisakis IgE has been evaluated by indirect ELISA based on recombinant antigens Ani s 1 and Ani s 7 (Mladineo et al., 2014). It was found to be 2% overall (inland, urban and island population), with the highest prevalence occurring in the island population (3.5%, Fisher’s exact 95% CI 1.42-6.45). Expectedly, it prevailed among individuals who consumed raw fish or had daily fish consumption of homemade origin, or had professional, artisanal or hobby contact with fisheries or the fish industry.
Case reports or epidemiological data for other EU countries is lacking or is not publicly available.
In contrast, C. osculatum has to date been implicated in a human case only in Australia (Shamsi and Butcher, 2011).
Only extreme cases characterised by ingestion of large number of larvae, or particularly pathogenic larvae, where endoscopy or a surgical approach such as laparoscopy is exerted in hospitals, are reported and available for analysis.
Therefore, the resulting data that could be collected among EU countries vary, being insufficiently robust to create a meaningful epidemiological analysis.
The best example of this is observed in Croatia, where apparently 2% of Dalmatian population is seropositive to specific Anisakis antigens, with only two clinical cases reported. More public and professional campaigns are needed to explain the risk of Anisakis infection to both consumers and medical experts.
References [… prikaži]
1. AAITO-IFIACI Anisakis Consortium. (2011): Anisakis hypersensitivity in Italy: prevalence and clinical features: a multicenter study. Allergy 66, 1563-1569.
2. AKAHANE, H., M. SANO and M. KOBAYASHI (1998): Three cases of human gnathostomiasis caused by Gnathostoma hispidum, with particular reference to the identification of parasitic larvae. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 29, 611-614.
3. ARRIAZA, B. and V. STANDEN (2009): Bioarqueología. Historia biocultural de los antiguos pobladores del extremo norte de Chile. Editorial Universitaria, Santiago, p. 148. In Spanish.
4. ARMENTIA, A., M. LOMBARDERO, A. CALLEJO, J. M. MARTÍN SANTOS, F. J. MARTÍN GIIL, J. VEGA, M. L. ARRANZ and C. MARTÍNEZ (1998): Occupational asthma by Anisakis simplex. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 102, 831-834.
5. AUER, H., H. LESKOWSCHEK, J. ENGLER, G. LEITNER, C. WENTZEL, W. WOLKERSTORFER and R. SCHNEIDER (2007): Epidemiologie und Nosologie der Anisakiose, einer in Mitteleuropa selten diagnostizierten Helminthozoonosezwei Fallberichte. Wien Klin. Wochenschr. 119, 106-109. In German.
6. BAO, M., G. J. PIERCE, S. PASCUAL, M. GONZÁLEZ-MUÑOZ, S. MATTIUCCI, I. MLADINEO, P. CIPRIANI, I. BUŠELIĆ and N. J. STRACHAN (2017): Assessing the risk of an emerging zoonosis of worldwide concern: anisakiasis. Sci. Rep. 7, 43699.
7. BAPTISTA-FERNANDES, T., RODRIGUES, M., CASTRO, I., P. PAIXÃO, P. PINTO-MARQUES, L. ROQUE, S. BELO, P. M. FERREIRA, K. MANSINHO and C. TOSCANO (2017): Human gastric hyperinfection by Anisakis simplex: A severe and unusual presentation and a brief review. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 64, 38-41.
8. BARBUZZA, O., F. GUARNERI, G. GALTIERI, S. GANGEMI and M. VACCARO (2009): Protein contact dermatitis and allergic asthma caused by Anisakis simplex. Cont. Dermat. 60, 239-240.
9. BLAŽEKOVIĆ, K., I. LEPEN PLEIĆ, M. ĐURAS, T. GOMERČIĆ and I. MLADINEO (2015): Three Anisakis spp. isolated from toothed whales stranded along the eastern Adriatic Sea coast. Int. J. Parasitol. 45, 17-31.
10. BOUWKNEGT, M., B. DEVLEESSCHAUWE, H. GRAHAM, L. J. ROBERTSON, J. VAN DER GIESSEN and THE EURO-FBP PARTICIPANTS (2018): Prioritization of foodborne parasites in Europe, 2016. Euro Surveill. 23, 17-00161.
11. CAMMILLERI, G., COSTA, A., S. GRACI, M. D. BUSCEMI, R. COLLURA, A. VELLA, A. PULVIRENTI, A. CICERO, G. GIANGROSSO, P. SCHEMBRI and V. FERRANTELLI (2018): Presence of Anisakis pegreffii in farmed sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) commercialized in Southern Italy: A first report. Vet. Parasitol. 259, 13-16.
12. CAVALLERO, S., D. SCRIBANO and S. D’AMELIO (2016): First case report of invasive pseudoterranoviasis in Italy. Parasitol. Int. 65, 488-490.
13. CAVALLERO, S., A. MARTINI, G. MIGLIARA, C. DE VITO, S. IAVICOLI and S. D’AMELIO (2018): Anisakiasis in Italy: Analysis of hospital discharge records in the years 2005-2015. PLoS ONE 13, e0208772.
14. CIPRIANI, P., V. ACERRA, B. BELLISARIO, G. L. SBARAGLIA, R. CHELESCHI, G. NASCETTI and S. MATTIUCCI (2016): Larval migration of the zoonotic parasite Anisakis pe- greffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in European anchovy, Engraulis encrasicolus: implications to seafood safety. Food Contr. 59, 148-157.
15. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) (2010): Scientific Opinion on risk assessment of parasites in fishery products. EFSA J. 8, 1543.
16. EIRAS, J. C., G. C. PAVANELLI, R. M. TAKEMOTO and Y. NAWA (2018): An overview of fish-borne nematodiases among returned travelers for recent 25 years – unexpected diseases sometimes far away from the origin. Korean J. Parasitol. 56, 215-227.
17. FAO (2014): The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Opportunities and challenges. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
18. FAO/ WHO (2014): Multicriteria-based ranking for risk management of food-borne parasites. Microbiological Risk Assessment Series No. 23. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and World Health Organization.
19. FAO (2016): The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
20. FORNACIARI, G. and R. GAETA (2014): Chapter 2 Paleoparasitology of helminths. In: Bruschi, F.: Helminth infections and their impact on global public health. Springer, Wien (29-49).
21. GUARDONE, L., A. ARMANI, D. NUCERA, F. COSTANZO, S. MATTIUCCI and F. BRUSCHI (2018): Human anisakiasis in Italy: a retrospective epidemiological study over two decades. Parasite 25, 41.
22. HOCHBERG, N. S. and D. H. HAMER (2010): Anisakidosis: Perils of the deep. Clin. Infect. Dis. 51, 806-812.
23. HUBERT, B., J. BACOU and H. BELVEZE (1989): Epidemiology of human anisakiasis: incidence and sources in France. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 40, 301-303.
24. JURADO-PALOMO J., M. C. LÓPEZ-SERRANO and I. MONEO (2010): Multiple acute parasitization by Anisakis simplex. J. Investig. Allergol. Clin. Immunol. 20, 437-441.
25. JURIĆ, I., Z. POGORELIĆ, R. DESPOT and I. MRKLIĆ (2013): Unusual cause of small intestine obstruction in a child small intestine anisakiasis: report of a case. Scot. Med. J. 58, e32-e36.
26. LEVSEN, A. and A. MAAGE (2016): Absence of parasitic nematodes in farmed, harvest quality Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) in Norway – results from a large scale survey. Food Contr. 68, 25-29.
27. LEVSEN, A., C. S. SVANEVIK, P. CIPRIANI, S. MATTIUCCI, M. GAY, L. C. HASTIE, I. BUŠELIĆ, I. MLADINEO, H. KARL., U. OSTERMEYER, K. BUCHMANN, D. P. HØJGAARD, A. F. GONZÁLEZ, S. PASCUAL and G. J. PIERCE (2018): A survey of zoonotic nematodes of commercial key fish species from major European fishing grounds – Introducing the FP7 PARASITE exposure assessment study. Fisher. Res. 202, 4-21.
28. MATTIUCCI, S., P. CIPRIANI, A. LEVSEN, M. PAOLETTI and G. NASCETTI (2018): Molecular epidemiology of Anisakis and anisakiasis: an ecological and evolutionary road map. Adv. Parasitol. 99, 93-263.
29. MAZZUCCO, W., G. LACCA, R. CUSIMANO, A. PROVENZANI, A. COSTA, A. M. DI NOTO, M. F. MASSENTI, M. S. LETO-BARONE, G. DI LORENZO and F. VITALE (2012): Prevalence of sensitization to Anisakis simplex among professionally exposed populations in Sicily. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health, 67, 91-97.
30. MIYAZAKI, I. (1960): On the genus Gnathostoma and human gnathostomiasis, with special reference to Japan. Exp. Parasitol. 9, 338-370.
31. MLADINEO, I. and V. POLJAK (2014): Ecology and genetic structure of zoonotic Anisakis spp. from Adriatic commercial fish species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 80, 1281-1290.
32. MLADINEO, I., V. POLJAK, V. MARTÍNEZ-SERNÁNDEZ and F. M. UBEIRA (2014): Anti-Anisakis IgE Seroprevalence in the healthy Croatian coastal population and associated risk factors. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 8, e2673.
33. MLADINEO, I., I. BUŠELIĆ, J. HRABAR, A. VRBATOVIĆ and I. RADONIĆ (2017): Population parameters and mito-nuclear mosaicism of Anisakis spp. in the Adriatic Sea. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 212, 46-54.
34. MLADINEO, I., M. POPOVIĆ, I. DRMIĆ-HOFMAN and V. POLJAK (2016): A case report of Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda, Anisakidae) identified from archival paraffin sections of a Croatian patient. BMC Inf. Diseas. 16, 42.
35. MONEO, I., N. CARBALLEDA-SANGIAO and M. GONZÁLEZ-MUÑOZ. (2017): New perspectives on the diagnosis of allergy to Anisakis spp. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 17, 27.
36. NAWA, Y., W. MALEEWONG, P. M. INTAPAN and S. P. DÍAZ-CAMACHO (2015): Gnathostoma. In: Xiao, L., Ryan, U., Y. Feng: Biology of Foodborne Parasites. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA. (405-425).
37. NIEUWENHUIZEN, N. E. and A. L. LOPATA (2014): Allergic reactions to Anisakis found in fish. Curr. Allergy Asthma Rep. 14: 455.
38. PURELLO-D’AMBROSIO, F., E. PASTORELLO, S. GANGEMI, G. LOMBARDO, L. RICCIARDI, O. FOGLIANI and R. A. MERENDINO (2000): Incidence of sensitivity to Anisakis simplex in a risk population of fishermen/fishmongers. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 84, 439-444.
39. REGULATION (EC) No 853/2004 of Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 laying down specific hygiene rules for food of animal origin, OJ L 139, 30.4.2004.
40. SANTORO, C., S. VINTON DORSE and K. J. REINHARD (2003): Inca expansion and parasitism in the Lluta Valley: preliminary data. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 98, 161-163.
41. SERRANO-MOLINER, M., M. MORALES-SUAREZ-VARELA and M. ADELA VALERO (2018): Epidemiology and management of foodborne nematodiasis in the European Union, systematic review 2000–2016. Pathog. Global Health 112, 249-258.
42. SHAMSI, S. and A. R. BUTCHER (2011): First report of human anisakidosis in Australia. Med. J. Austral. 194, 199-200.
43. SHAMSI, S. (2019): Seafood-borne parasitic diseases: a “one-health” approach is needed. Fishes 4, 9.
44. SHAVIKLO, A. R. (2015): Development of fish protein powder as an ingredient for food applications: a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 52, 648-661.
45. ŠIMAT, V., J. MILETIĆ, T. BOGDANOVIĆ, V. POLJAK and I. MLADINEO (2015): Role of biogenic amines in the post-mortem migration of Anisakis pegreffii (Nematoda: Anisakidae Dujardin, 1845) larvae into fish fillets. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 214, 179-186.
46. VERHAMME, M. A. and C. H. RAMBOER (1988): Anisakiasis caused by herring in vinegar: a little know medical problem. Gut 29, 843-847.
47. WHO (1995): Control of foodborne trematode infections. Report of a WHO Study Group. WHO Tech. Rep. Ser. 849.
48. YERA, H., É. FRÉALLE, E. DUTOIT and J. DUPOUY-CAMET (2018): A national retrospective survey of anisakidosis in France (2010-2014): decreasing incidence, female predominance, and emerging allergic potential. Parasite 25, 23.
Anisakijaza u Europi: emergentna, zapostavljena, pogrešno dijagnosticirana, ili sve od navedenoga?
Dr. sc. Ivona MLADINEO, dr. med. vet., izvanredna profesorica, znanstvena savjetnica u trajnom zvanju, Institut za oceanografiju i ribarstvo, Split, Hrvatska
Učestalost parazitoza koje se prenose ribom je posljednjih desetljeća porasla širom svijeta, potpomognuta pojačanom migracijom i prijevozom ljudi i hrane, širenjem kulinarskog trenda koji se osniva na sirovoj i termički nedovoljno obrađenoj morskoj hrani, održivijim upravljanjem vodenim resursima, poglavito morskim sisavcima u smislu njihove zaštite, kao i razvojem osjetljivijih dijagnostičkih alata.
Sudeći prema nedavnoj europskoj rang-listi, s gledišta javnog zdravstva, jedna od najznačajnijih zoonoza je anisakijaza.
Infektivna ličinka trećeg stadija oblića Anisakis spp. se prenosi konzumacijom nedovoljno termički obrađene ribe i glavonožaca, uzrokujući želučani, crijevni, ektopični i (želučano) alergijski klinički oblik bolesti u ljudi. Dodatno, temeljem široko rasprostranjene seroprevalencije anti-Anisakis antitijela u asimptomatične i zdrave populacije, nedavno je predložen i peti oblik bolesti. U suprotnosti s ubikvitarnosti ličinki u parateničnom domaćinu (ribe i glavonošci), epidemiološko stanje anisakijaze u Europi je vrlo raznoliko, većinom nepoznato i vrlo podcijenjeno. U tu svrhu ovaj rad naglašava najznačajnije nedavne procjene kliničkih slučajeva anisakijaze na razini Europe, dajući i kratki pregled bioloških osobitosti oblića.
Key words: Anisakis spp., zoonoze, oblići, riba, glavonošci